Monday, July 12, 2010

"Call" To Action

In the past few weeks, we've become way too accustomed to the sound of gunshots in our neighborhood. Two people were hit by gunfire when someone shot into a crowd at Broadway and Wilson on a recent Sunday evening. Someone was shot in a car at Montrose and Dover. Someone died from multiple gunshot wounds at Clarendon and Windsor. And this doesn't even take into account all the "shots fired" that we've heard since the weather warmed up.

Here's the latest: Last night someone's car window was shot out while it was parked on the street, and bullets were shot into the home of a "civilian."

"I live on the 4500 block of Magnolia ave, and I have written here before regarding issues in the Uptown Neighborhood. Around 2:30 Sunday morning I was woken up by the group of "locals" who roam up and down Magnolia all the time, and they were sitting on some cars that were parked in front of my building.

None of them live in or around my building. I called the police and about 20 minutes later they were gone and I went back to sleep. At around 5am gunshots woke me up again, and sadly I was unsure if they were gunshots or some of the loud fireworks that were launched on the weekend of the 4th.

I woke this morning and went into my living room to find a bullet hole in one of my living room windows.
I immediately called 911 for the second time in a matter of hours. The officer arrived, filed a report helped us find where the bullet landed which was about 25 feet away in the wood molding around the front door. My roommates and I are completely freaked out by this, wondering what would have happened if it was earlier and we were in the living room on the couch, walking in the front door, or one of our animals were sitting in the window. Scary stuff.

Later this afternoon I noticed police again on my block with two "locals" with their hands on the police car hood. Then even later I noticed police again because apparently one of the cars parked across the street from us also had a window shot out. Sad stuff, scary stuff. I love this neighborhood, and I'm so upset that a small number of the people in this area are ruining it for the majority. Not only that but my bedroom window is maybe 5 feet from the window where the bullet came through.

I just wanted to share because I think we need to promote calling the police as much as possible when these guys are "hanging out", and we need to start feeling secure in our own homes, which right now I do not."



It goes without saying that Ald. Shiller is silent while all this is going on. She has never - NEVER ONCE - acknowledged, or given any indication that she cares, that people are dying in front of her office, or that people are being shot in the middle of the afternoon there on a regular basis (including a young mother holding a baby). Her message is clear -- Until we vote in a new alderman, one who actually gives a damn about creating a safe community for ALL residents -- we're in this alone, folks. (If you have any doubt how much contempt the alderman and her staff have for our concerns, reread "This Isn't Your College Campus, Sweetie.")

But we have a huge advantage: There are more of us than there are of them. In other words, there are more residents who want a safe and healthy neighborhood than there are gangbangers and troublemakers. They want a gang war? We say, let's give them one. Let's fight for our OWN turf.

Call 911 when you see anything suspicious. The "locals" who hang out on Magnolia and sit on cars... call 911 when you see it. Feel threatened when you're walking down the street? That's a 911 call as long as you're willing to sign a complaint and show up in court. Call, call, call. Every call may not get a response because the police prioritize and if something bigger's going on, that's where they'll be. But if we don't call, we'll continue to feel victimized.

Start attending your CAPS meetings. The police brass are really good about showing up and they can explain what's going on. Better yet, you can tell them what's going on, what you see. If you can't make it, ask that your block club send a representative who can be a liaison. See who else is there -- which aldermanic candidates have a track record of attending. We know the alderman won't be caught at a CAPS meeting. See who cares enough about your safety to show up.
We're sick of printing these stories. We're sick of wondering if the next bullet that comes through a window will be at our house. We're sick of driving around in the evening and having to slam on the brakes to avoid gunfire. We think you feel the same way. Time to take back our own turf. The gangs have ramped up the aggression in recent years, and we've got to do the same thing. We've got the numbers; let's back up our advantage with action.

We can't say this enough: Make a commitment today that you will vote in the February aldermanic election. If you don't, you're giving your tacit approval to living like this for another four years.

Update: From a reader going to work this morning: "About 15m ago (4:50 or so) heard the typical yelling around Argyle Stop but then heard three shots fired."

43 comments:

  1. THIS.....IS......UPPPPPTTTTOOOOWWWWNNNNN!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qR0Uke2XNI

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hope the cops dusted, cleaned your counter tops and mopped because they have basically become a clean up crew responding to violence only after it happens.

    What is being done to prevent this BS? Myself and everyone else who lives on Magnolia can pinpoint the problem people, buildings and corners. Your telling me the cops can't do the same and target them or shake them down. Its clear the gangsters know the cops wont do anything because they walk up and down the street at all areas of the night practically advertising that they are selling drugs. I am so sick of this that I can barely contain myself anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Magnolia is such a beautiful street all the way from Montrose to Lawrence, so it is a shame that it has the problems that it does. This is ridiculous. The landlords of the problem building on this stretch need to step and remove their bad tenants. Get rid of those guys, and all sorts of problems will disappear.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I will make my commitment to vote for a better and safer ward. Most politicians are all talk and no change as what is happening now in the white house but, I think we all have had enough of the bad here in Uptown and we must stand together and fight back by electing a person who really cares about Uptown and feels the needs of the residents who now cannot even feel safe walking in our streets or looking out a window without the fear of being shot.

    ReplyDelete
  5. To the Neighbor that posted this - Thank you for sharing, and I am sorry that, this time, it had to be you.

    You are right in your characteristication of the good people of the good people of Uptown as a "gang" of fighters that commit to doing the right thing and taking positive steps to (continue to) take back the neighborhood.

    5 or 10 years ago, windows WERE being shot out in Uptown. The difference is, unless it was the building next door, you were very unlikely to hear about it.

    Well, the GIG IS UP. Everyone with 1/2 a brain can see with their own eyes the MOUNTING evidence of the unaccaptable situation here.

    If just the 2000 Facebook fans of Uptown Update would commit to taking 5-10 mins of action for the community EVERY week, and particularly calling 911 or 311 when they see something instead of just ignoring it (and c'mon people, its not that hard to find a situation at any hour of the day or night that could use some kind of attention), we could show our collective gang of citizens, police, and anyone else doing positive actitives is much bigger than the concentrated street gangs that pepper the area at specific properties where the owners/manegers tolerate unacceptable behavior that is destroying our community.

    Just a thought. Until someone organizes the resources of this Ward and completlely bypasses the unacceptable city leadership, its going to be a long summer.

    ReplyDelete
  6. That is horrendously scary. Please let Shiller, your state rep (Harris?), and your state sen (Steans?) aware. This should not be happening. Don't those aholes ever sleep?! Hopefully arrests were made.

    ReplyDelete
  7. yeah because electing a new alderman will change everything. I live in the 47th ward and the alderman patrols the streets with a nightstick every day. gosh i feel so safe!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. The residents of this apartment should call the news media because it might make a nice followup story to the few that have run in the past year or two about Shiller's soft stance on crime.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Come on folks it's just one tiny bullet hole.

    This is the City you know not the plains of North Dakota.

    This isn't Alderman Shiller's problem.

    ReplyDelete
  10. HALL & OATS SAID IT BEST, "THEY ONLY COME OUT AT NIGHT, THE LEAN AND HUNGRY TYPE". THEY SLEEP ALL DAY AND THAN GET UP TO GO TO "WORK" AT NIGHT...THAT WOULD BE DEALING. I HAVE TO GIVE THIS SITE, THE BLOGGER AND THE PEOPLE WHO COMMENT ON HERE, GREAT PRAISE AND CREDIT. I THINK YOU ARE ALL DOING A GREAT JOB OF KEEPING THE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMED AND DOING WHAT YOU'RE DOING TO SAVE YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. KUDO'S!
    THERE IS ANOTHER BLOG CALLED "ACTION UPTOWN" THAT GIVES THE PROCESS FOR SHUTTING DOWN CRIME RIDDEN & DRUG INFESTED BUILDINGS. JUST A THOUGHT.

    ReplyDelete
  11. slvg_bvg,

    1 - How often do residents of the 47th ward find bullet holes in their windows?

    2 - When was the last time someone was shot and killed in the 47th ward?

    3 - How many young mothers have been shot in the 47th ward?

    4 - How many times have 47th ward residents seen large groups of teenaged boys violently running amok on their streets?

    I'll give Schulter this: when there was a town hall meeting at Truman College, his office was represented ... on the panel.

    Not in the first row of the audience.

    Aldermen cannot stop criminal activity by themselves, granted - but having someone in office who doesn't ignore the issues does has a positive effect.

    Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Unfortunately, there is only so much landlords can do re. problem tenants...from what I have heard, many of the gangbangers do not live in the neighborhood and the ones that do are not on any leases...they're living with family or friends.

    I think the #1 thing that will help improve Magnolia is to put pressure on whomever owns the strip mall at Magnolia/Wilson to hire ARMED security. It's pretty clear that ground zero is the sidewalk adjacent to the convenience store on that corner. The area is always trashed since the bangers litter the area up all the time, probably a gesture of defiance as much as general laziness.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Are the troubled homes CHA? Are they being enforced as drug homes? The City of Chicago has a lot more sway in getting people OUT of homes then the police. UU has a link to filling out the drug house form.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yo: Last summer a bar keep in 47 was shot and killed. In the last 90 days, there have been fewer total index crime events reported in 46 than there there have been in 47. Same holds for year to year numbers. And, even when adjusted for pop. density, the comparison still holds.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Suzanne, are you suggesting that the level of crime in the 46th Ward is about the same as in the 47th?

    ReplyDelete
  16. The building next door to me is 4510 N. Magnolia, and this building and the one across the street has continually been the problem. I have seen many drug deals occur outside of one of the apartments which has been empty for the past year. I am going to fill out the Drug/Gang House form and submit it on this building. I also know that my property management company has been in contact with the company running 4510 and has had discussions about the drugs and tenants. But I agree that many of the gangbangers I see on a daily basis do not live in this building or any other building on this block. They're not stupid, they might be reckless and dangerous, but they enough to keep their "busines" away from their own homes.

    ReplyDelete
  17. For the record, during the past 12 months, the following has occurred:
    46th Ward: 39 prostitution arrests
    47th Ward: 1 prostitution arrest

    46th Ward: 557 drug arrests
    47th Ward: 220 drug arrests

    46th Ward: 302 violent crime arrests
    47th Ward: 147 violent crime arrests

    46th Ward: 75 aggravated batteries
    47th Ward: 32 aggravated batteries

    46th Ward: 200 simple assaults
    47th Ward: 117 simple assaults

    Kinda sheds a different light on your statistics, Suzanne.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yo: Last summer a bar keep in 47 was shot and killed.

    Yep. And someone was shot and killed in the 46th, last week.

    Also, someone was stabbed to death last March.


    What Suzanne is saying is that from a high level vantage, the crime stats between the 46th and 47th are pretty close, with the 47th having a higher total number of reported crimes.

    That, and $0.25 will get you 7 minutes of parking since we've all heard those stats before and for some strange reason, we keep hearing gun shots.

    ReplyDelete
  19. There was sadly a bartender killed in Lincoln Square last year, probably as part of an after hours robbery.

    http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2009/10/owner-severely-injured-outside-lincoln-square-bar.html

    But I'd still give Uptown the edge on random gun play at all hours of the night. At a minimum there was the guy shot down on Clifton (shortly after he got kicked out of Cornerstone IIRC) and the poor Truman College kid gunned down on his way home from class.

    Somebody else can do the google research but unless it's a vast Lincoln Square media conspiracy I think Uptown has seen a lot more firearms violence.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Scratch that....

    Seven murders within 8 blocks of the Wilson el stop since September 2007.

    http://chicago.everyblock.com/crime/filter/streets/clifton-ave/4506-4611n/8-blocks/by-primary-type/homicide/

    Three murders within 8 blocks of where the O'Lanagan's bartender was killed in Lincoln Square during the same time period.

    http://chicago.everyblock.com/crime/filter/streets/montrose-ave/2300-2347w/8-blocks/by-primary-type/homicide/

    If somebody wants to play around with Everyblock on other crime categories I'd bet that 2 to 1 or better ratio holds true for most other serious crimes too.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Just for giggles, I ran a quick comparison of crime incidents which occured between June 22 and July 5th - within 1/2 mile of 4554 N Broadway and a half mile 4237 N Lincoln.

    This data comes from CPD.

    Incident: 46th:47th

    Homicide 1st/2nd: 0:0
    Involuntary Manslaughter: 0:0
    Criminal Sexual Assualt: 1:0
    Robbery: 6:2
    Aggrevated Assualt: 1:0
    Aggrevated Battery: 2:0
    Burglary: 0:6
    Larceny: 24:17
    Motor Vehicle theft: 0:0
    Simple Assualt: 8:0
    Simple Battery: 13:4
    Arson: 0:0
    Forgery/Counterfeiting: 1:0
    Fraud: 5:1
    Embezzlement:0:0
    Stolen Property: 1:0
    Vandalism: 14:2
    Weapons violation: 1:0
    Criminal Sexual abuse: 2:1
    Drug abuse: 11:0
    Gambling 2:0
    Disorderly conduct:1:0
    Misc Non-Index Offense 7:2

    Total count of events which occured between June 22 and July 5 within a half mile of the respective alderman's office:

    46th: 100
    47th: 35

    ReplyDelete
  22. To whomever posted this:

    I am so sorry to hear that this happened, especially on a beautiful street like Magnolia. It can be an extremely scary occurrence, and trust me, as I know exactly the fear that you are experiencing. The IDENTICAL thing happened to me, with the only difference being that it occurred one block south. It was heavily discussed on UU last year -- see http://www.uptownupdate.com/2009/05/bullets-flying-on-magnolia.html

    Following that event, concerned citizens complained to everyone that would listen -- Greg Harris, Heather Steans, the police, Commander Boehner, the FBI (yes, even the FBI... apparently you can meet with them!) and we told them of this problem building, whose occupants shot at our house. And, only 9 days later, guess what happened? We got them evicted -- see http://www.uptownupdate.com/2009/05/problem-tenant-gets-evicted-at-last.html

    So this message is to all of you who are both directly affected by this and also those who are supremely outraged. Do something. Call the police, the commander, the FBI. It actually works, and this is proof. Magnolia is a serene, beautiful street, but unfortunately too often I see that the owners on that street complain but do not take action. It may be frustrating, but keep trying and I assure you that you can make a difference.

    ReplyDelete
  23. >> I think the #1 thing that will help improve Magnolia is to put pressure on whomever owns the strip mall at Magnolia/Wilson to hire ARMED security. It's pretty clear that ground zero is the sidewalk adjacent to the convenience store on that corner. The area is always trashed since the bangers litter the area up all the time, probably a gesture of defiance as much as general laziness.

    2. There needs to be community intervention in some of these problem buildings (as Flyonthewall mentioned). For example, 4540 Magnolia is full of a lot of decent folks, but there are some problem tenants there. On Saturday, I spoke to an elderly woman who lives there and is absolutely fed up with the few problem tenants, but is pretty much powerless to do anything herself. I would hope that if anything happens with the strip mall, it would be done in tandom with 4540 -- as there are tons of folks that hang out there who are clearly not affilitated with the building. UCC has been involved with joining neighbors and sitting down with management boards to seek change. That is how that eviction happened last year down the street. Of course, there are plenty of other troubling buildings as you head toward Sunnyside Mall too...

    3. It would be really useful to have an active Graceland Wilson Neighbors block club back in action, if nothing else that as a single rallying point for public safety on 4400-4500 blocks of Magnolia. If interested, a person named Katharine is apparently trying to revive it (her email address can be found here: http://bit.ly/czsg4M) -- although there hasn't been much movement since this facebook page went up a couple months ago: http://bit.ly/bagZl0 . I'd encourage anyone on those two blocks (or 4400-4500 Malden) to contact her and see what can be done to speed up the restoration process. GWNA has otherwise has been in hibernation since late 2008.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Holy Moley: Comparable level of crime? Depends on how you measure it. That was my point ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  25. "Depends on how you measure it."

    Is that like what the definition of "is" is?

    Your argument just got shredded. Next time Suzanne why not just dust off a Steven Colbert quote...

    "I'm not a fan of facts. You see, the facts can change, but my opinion will never change, no matter what the facts are."

    Better luck next time defending Helen.

    ReplyDelete
  26. "There are lies, damn lies and statistics." -- Mark Twain

    If all you do is look at the statistics you may not always get a true picture of just what is going on.

    Example:

    Bullet through window = criminal damage to property.

    Rock through window = criminal damage to property.

    Which one has a greater likelihood of causing serious injury?

    And scattered gunfire? If the police don't arrest anyone, how is it classified? Daily we see the drug dealers selling openly on the street. But if they all run into the gang house when the cops drive by, what statistic to you classify it under?

    Suzanne, bah.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Not sure who 'Suzanne' is rooting for, but I know I refuse to walk down Magnolia.
    I live opposite of this, on Malden, and I can hear and see the chaos that seems to center around the buildings across the alley.

    I just checked the 46th Ward website....saw something about 'trains not being able to stop at Argyle'...but nothing about the latest shootings.
    Even on a simple P.R. level, wouldn't it do a world of good to at least acknowledge this ongoing crap??

    ReplyDelete
  28. No argument to shred, Chipper. Citing published data in response to Yo’s request hardly constitutes an argument. All we have here are a few descriptive data points. I cited a total on index crime and holy moley broke out some specific index and non-index crime tallies. Both citations are correct. But each paints a different picture.

    And that’s the not so big thought here: It is interesting, useful, possibly even revelatory to think about how we frame information, especially information about crime.

    But if one is intent on seeing things one way, or intent on being cynical or argumentative no matter what, or even filtering comments through the prism of which candidate one may be (or may not be) rooting for, then facts (regardless of source or flavor) and statistics (regardless of their descriptive or predictive power) won’t matter.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Suzanne, that was worthy of Helen. I know there were sentences there because I read them four times, but I have no clue what your point is. Are you pulling a Helen, blaming fears about safety on "political operatives?" Here's what I can't intellectualise away:

    1 - people having shots fired through their windows five feet from where they sleep is scary. 2 - gunfire at all hours & people being shot at busy intersections is scary. 3 - people being killed two blocks from my home is scary. 4 - an alderman who refuses to deal with it and relies on state legislators to do her job, dealing with the cops & the community, is intolerable.

    How this neighbourhood stacks up against the ones around it, or Englewood, or Beirut, or Honolulu, or how it was ten or five or thirty years ago - doesn't mean an effin' thing to me. I am afraid NOW & HERE.

    The candidate who will get my vote is the one who treats me like the fears I have about this neighbourhood are valid, rather than pretending it’s all just ducky, or intellectualising everything away. I want someone who can come up with solutions instead of rationalisations. No one who blames political enemies or sniffs that “it’s not as bad as XYZ” can be trusted to look for workable solutions.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I don't understand why these gangbangers can't be legally labeled as terrorists and get the same attention from our gov't as the Taliban. I guarantee that they get put on the terror watch list and you will see the streets get quite real quick.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I generally like reading Suzanne Elder's posts, as they often offer an interesting counterbalance to some of the more "crazy-right" stuff I see, while still being balanced with a modicum of common sense.

    The stuff she's written in the comments section of this post is just unbelievable though. I mean, wow.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I wonder which candidate is angling for the coveted IVI-IPO endorsement.

    Best to make that vote a recorded one in writing.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Guys, really, what's so hard here? Yo challenged us for incident data. I provided it. Your reaction is what's a little loopy and extended what was a footnote into a debate.

    All I'm asking you to do is consider how you frame information and consider what your comparisons may mean.

    I am not disputing what's occurred in Uptown. I'm simply pointing out that when comparing Uptown to other neighborhoods, there is a failure to account for the complete picture. Why is that meaningful?

    For example, the 47th ward data I provided and the 46 that Holy Moley provided are raw tallies. Take those numbers and adjust them for population density differences and---yes, per 1,000---the wards are not as different as you might like to believe.

    It's selection bias. And it rages on this website and elsewhere. Why does it matter? Because it is a political tool. Does Helen employ it? Of course. Do the other candidates employ it. Every single one.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Len
    I doubt Guantanamo Bay would sound threatening to them. You want to intimidate them? Then buy them an alarm clock that goes off before noon !

    ReplyDelete
  35. Since theoretically each ward is(was) similar in population in 2000 just run the crime stats on a ward wide basis.

    That should give an approximate approximation of the appropriate approximate levels of crime.

    Now there is crime in the 47th Ward.

    There is a gang presence particularly between Clark and Ashland, in the 47th Ward. Insane Latin Coho Lipped Wombat Gangsta ADD Killers or something.

    They like to stand around flashing gang signs and so help me Zeus wearing cardboard Burger King crowns on their heads.

    It is both funny and pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Who gives a shi$ about the 47th. Let's worry about OUR Ward and the windows that are being blown out Our Ward and the lack of retail that brings in revenue instead of giving it away. And our Ward and the lack of communication from someone whose salary we pay.

    Compare and move numbers around all you want. Bottom line is, people need to worry their own backyard. Shots into a living room is a sad wake up call.

    Vote the slag out.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Aaaaaactually, I didn't challenge everyone, and I wasn't asking for incident data, per se.

    I posed my questions to slvg_bvg and could be easily answered by anyone who keeps up current affairs.

    And those answers certainly didn't require getting into a deep statistical review (which is why I choose those teeteringly rhetorical questions).

    We don't need to peer into statistical tables and discuss the validity, or political expedience, of those datasets to determine if there have been more homicides in the 46th than the 47th.

    Or if one ward or another has had its share of "fisticuffs".

    Of course, Suzanne is correct in saying that people (politicians, specifically) will skew data results to better their argument.

    But, that wasn't the point.

    The point was if an alderman can or cannot influence criminal activity in their ward.

    My argument being that yes, yes they can - if they take the initiative.

    Not to say that taking the initiative will automatically generate positive results; but, it sure as hell beats ignoring the issue - and sends a message to the criminal element that it might be easier to find an area where the alderman takes a more relaxed view of crime.

    At the very worst, if an alderman is to take that initiative, they'll at least garner the support of their constituents and/or shield themselves from the inherent criticism for not doing so.

    Of course, this entire argument would be dead in the water if a certain elected official weren't so ignorantly foolhardy to declare, publicly, that crime isn't her issue.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Irish, the ward populations are not roughly equal. In theory, they should be and they will become more so AFTER census and redistricting are completed but right now? Not so much. 46 is nearly have again as dense as 47.

    And Yo, you're correct. You queried; you did not challenge. That was my interpretation. Your questions suggested to me a misleading comparison---one that held 47 out as somehow less burdened by the incidence and grief of crime and that this was attributable in some way to actions of that ward's Alderman. That was my read, not necessarily your intent.

    That said, do you think Alderman Schulter is contributing something to that outcome and if so what do you think that contribution is?

    ReplyDelete
  39. "That said, do you think Alderman Schulter is contributing something to that outcome and if so what do you think that contribution is?" -Suzanne

    Well, for starters, someone from his office attends CAPS meetings. He also thinks it's crazy to place so much subsidized housing into one area because it does have a bearing on the rate of crime in an area.

    I have never heard him or seen anything written from his office that judges the motivation of any particular group or person when they express concerns about safety either.

    Anyone who has taken a statistic course knows that you can support just about anything you want with them. However, some statistics are used to make a point more clear and accurate. Your stats, Susanne, was crammed full of bias and it was obvious.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Suzanne,

    the populations of the 46th Ward and 47th Ward are not going to be that different. I suspect the 47th has lost a bit of population in the last ten years because of gentrification and the 46th is likely roughly the same. With any population loss being offset by new construction which is more prevalent in this ward.

    Now the 46th Ward is "denser" than the 47th, but it also has less land area particularly if you don't count the lakefront parks and cemeteries.

    ReplyDelete
  41. That said, do you think Alderman Schulter is contributing something to that outcome and if so what do you think that contribution is?

    Like I said, he's at least putting on the public persona as an alderman who does think that crime is his issue and ensures that his office (either personally, or via proxy) are represented in the public.

    I'm not sure how scientifically sound the conclussion I implied via the 1/2 mile radius stats I provided might be, but when the alderman who doesn't see crime as an issue has ~3X as many crimes around their office as an alderman who does ... well, it's a tough argument to counter during an election cycle, wouldn't you say?

    Oh, and for the record, the line between my query and a challenge was fairly thin ;)

    ReplyDelete
  42. Suzanne: Perhaps it's not exactly ideal to use a reader's bullet ridden bay window story as a pivot for crime data comparison.

    Certainly, as a reader yourself, you are familiar with the number of bullet ridden posts that practically have their own mortgage on Uptown Update.

    Let em vent will ya?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Holy Moley...they're not "my" stats. They're from the same source that you drew yours. Brennan, I didn't cut the pivot but why dither? ;-)))

    ReplyDelete