Can someone please contact Alderbeast Tunney to see if he approves of this.
I know he thinks public sex hereis no big deal and I'd hate to think this might put a cramp on the festivities there.
Thankfully, the fence is open so if you are taking any young kids there to see some birds and enjoy nature you might see some "closeted GOP throatwarblers" engaging in short term mating behavior.
I myself will be heading over to Belmont and placing a mattress in front of Tunney's restaurant Ann Sather's and going at it with a variety of woman who are uglier than me. Not easy to find, but after an extensive internet search and visits to local prisons I have found a number of ideal candidates.
Hopefully, Tunney won't object as the police have other things to do.
Apparently park volunteers/stewards are not so happy with the new fencing and say they weren't consulted.
At Montrose Point, the money could have gone toward plantings in a transition area down to the nearby dunes or informational boards, said David Painter, the park's nature steward.
(Tribune, July 1, 2008)
Oddly, or "oddly," I guess, the cost for the fencing was $99,400 ... just under the $100,000 point at which park commissioners have to vote on such an expense.
Maybe Daley's family members are now selling plastic fences, as well as wrought iron?
The Trib gave $99,400 as the fencing contract amount. The article also talks about fencing that went up in several other areas, like Burnham Nature Sanctuary in Kenwood, Indian Boundary Park (where workers neglected to install a gate!) in Rogers Park and West Pullman Park.
I don't know if the $99,400 contract amount is per area or for all 11 areas that will eventually get fenced in with the new stuff.
Seen today outside the Bird Sanctuary at Montrose Harbor.
Can someone please contact Alderbeast Tunney to see if he approves of this.
ReplyDeleteI know he thinks public sex hereis no big deal and I'd hate to think this might put a cramp on the festivities there.
Thankfully, the fence is open so if you are taking any young kids there to see some birds and enjoy nature you might see some "closeted GOP throatwarblers" engaging in short term mating behavior.
I myself will be heading over to Belmont and placing a mattress in front of Tunney's restaurant Ann Sather's and going at it with a variety of woman who are uglier than me. Not easy to find, but after an extensive internet search and visits to local prisons I have found a number of ideal candidates.
Hopefully, Tunney won't object as the police have other things to do.
Apparently park volunteers/stewards are not so happy with the new fencing and say they weren't consulted.
ReplyDeleteAt Montrose Point, the money could have gone toward plantings in a transition area down to the nearby dunes or informational boards, said David Painter, the park's nature steward.
(Tribune, July 1, 2008)
Oddly, or "oddly," I guess, the cost for the fencing was $99,400 ... just under the $100,000 point at which park commissioners have to vote on such an expense.
Maybe Daley's family members are now selling plastic fences, as well as wrought iron?
Your tax dollars at work. $99,400?! Are you fricking kidding me. What a joke.
ReplyDeleteThe Trib gave $99,400 as the fencing contract amount. The article also talks about fencing that went up in several other areas, like Burnham Nature Sanctuary in Kenwood, Indian Boundary Park (where workers neglected to install a gate!) in Rogers Park and West Pullman Park.
ReplyDeleteI don't know if the $99,400 contract amount is per area or for all 11 areas that will eventually get fenced in with the new stuff.
There's another story about the fencing at the Magic Hedge in the current Inside.
ReplyDeleteKind of hard to read because it's the .jpg, not text.