Yeah,welp I guess Greg didn't want to have to face real opposition.Has anyone ever run against him?Personally, I'd rather be alderman than a state legislator.It pays better and you don't have to spend much time in Springfield.Of course being a state legislator is relatively low profile so you could still go out and about without damn bloggers yelling "arrrrgh" at you.
I like Greg. Even though I do think he'd do well in the alderman's office, I prefer having someone in Springfield who isn't a complete waste of oxygen.If Greg's gig is to get traction on marriage equality, then more power to him.
I am against all marriage. Gay or straight.As for Greg Harris he likely would be an OK alderman. Personally I want a state legislator who is going to take on the entrenched Mike Madigan machine.That would be interesting.
Harris would lose in February. Keep flucking that chicken "community leaders".
He is a good guy.